<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PLANNERS KNOW BEST? KELO V. NEW LONDON SAYS SO</title>
	<link>http://democraticSPACE.com/blog/2005/07/planners-know-best-kelo-v-new-london-says-so/</link>
	<description>DemocraticSPACE is one of North America's leading non-partisan political websites.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: DemocraticSpace.com/blog</title>
		<link>http://democraticSPACE.com/blog/2005/07/planners-know-best-kelo-v-new-london-says-so/#comment-3</link>
		<author>DemocraticSpace.com/blog</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 16:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://democraticSPACE.com/blog/2005/07/planners-know-best-kelo-v-new-london-says-so/#comment-3</guid>
					<description>[...] Here’s a website for you: privatization.org. These fine folks are dedicated to making everything, everywhere private (think: libertarian). The Fraser Institute must do them proud! Geoffrey Segal’s reaction to the Kelo/New London ruling is a classic libertarian scare tactic: because of Kelo, if cities are in trouble financially they are going to take your home in order to raise tax dollars. Now I don’t agree with Kelo either (see my response – probably the very few times I would agree with Segal), but to use this case as a justification for why we need ‘smaller’ government is pure politicking. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Here’s a website for you: privatization.org. These fine folks are dedicated to making everything, everywhere private (think: libertarian). The Fraser Institute must do them proud! Geoffrey Segal’s reaction to the Kelo/New London ruling is a classic libertarian scare tactic: because of Kelo, if cities are in trouble financially they are going to take your home in order to raise tax dollars. Now I don’t agree with Kelo either (see my response – probably the very few times I would agree with Segal), but to use this case as a justification for why we need ‘smaller’ government is pure politicking. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
