<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jan 7, 2006 Election Update: Conservatives Climbing</title>
	<link>http://democraticSPACE.com/blog/2006/01/jan-7-2006-election-update-conservatives-climbing/</link>
	<description>DemocraticSPACE is one of North America's leading non-partisan political websites.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Gil Warren</title>
		<link>http://democraticSPACE.com/blog/2006/01/jan-7-2006-election-update-conservatives-climbing/#comment-681</link>
		<author>Gil Warren</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://democraticSPACE.com/blog/2006/01/jan-7-2006-election-update-conservatives-climbing/#comment-681</guid>
					<description>Great Program! It seems very accurate from the ground. I have been campaigning for 35 years. When I add the number of Ontario seats for the NDP I get 21 not 20 . Is this because of the tie in Thunder Bay-Rainey River? NDP has the  momentum therefore the tie should go to us. Gil Warren, London North Centre NDP canvasser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Program! It seems very accurate from the ground. I have been campaigning for 35 years. When I add the number of Ontario seats for the NDP I get 21 not 20 . Is this because of the tie in Thunder Bay-Rainey River? NDP has the  momentum therefore the tie should go to us. Gil Warren, London North Centre NDP canvasser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
