Women, Visible Minorities in Ontario’s Legislature
Thursday December 14th 2006, 10:47 am
Filed under: - Electoral Reform,- Women and Politics,Canadian Politics

There is much discussion within the Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform about the need to increase representation of women and visible minorities. Many of the barriers to women and visible minorities relate to the internal machinations of the parties. But, there is little doubt that our winner-takes-all (first-past-the-post or FPTP) electoral system contributes to the problem. As I outlined in a series of Women and Politics back in July 2006, our FPTP system performs the worst of all electoral systems in electing women (averaging 18% women), while mixed-member systems perform best (averaging 30% women), followed closely by list proportional (list PR) systems (26% women). With all this discussion taking place, I thought I would put some numbers to Ontario’s situation. The numbers confirm the impression that women and visible minorities are under-represented — despite comprising 51.3% of Ontario’s population, women account for only 24.3% of the legislature, less than half of their share of the population. And despite comprising 22.9% of Ontario’s population1, visible minorities account or only 7.8% 6.8% of the legislature (all of whom are Liberals), less than one-third of their share of the population. Here are the details:

WOMEN
The Liberals have 25.0% women.
The NDP have 33.3% women.
The PCs have 21.7% women.

Here are Ontario’s women MPPs (if I’m missing someone, let me know):

1 Marie Bountrogianni LIB (Hamilton Mountain)
2 Laurel Broten LIB (Etobicoke—Lakeshore)
3 Donna Cansfield LIB (Etobicoke Centre)
4 Mary Anne Chambers LIB (Scarborough East)
5 Caroline DiCocco LIB (Sarnia—Lambton)
6 Cheri DiNovo NDP (Parkdale—High Park)
7 Leona Dombrowsky LIB (Hastings—Frontenac—L&A)
8 Christine Elliott PC (Whitby—Ajax)
9 Andrea Horwath NDP (Hamilton East)
10 Linda Jeffrey LIB (Brampton Centre)
11 Lisa MacLeod PC (Nepean—Carleton)
12 Judy Marsales LIB (Hamilton West)
13 Shelley Martel NDP (Nickel Belt)
14 Deb Matthews LIB (London North Centre)
15 Madeleine Meilleur LIB (Ottawa—Vanier)
16 Carol Mitchell LIB (Huron—Bruce)
17 Jennifer Mossop LIB (Stoney Creek)
18 Julia Munro PC (York North)
19 Sandra Pupatello LIB (Windsor West)
20 Liz Sandals LIB (Guelph—Wellington)
21 Laurie Scott PC (Haliburton—Victoria—Brock)
22 Monique Smith LIB (Nipissing)
23 Maria Van Bommel LIB (Lambton—Kent—Middlesex)
24 Elizabeth Witmer PC (Kitchener—Waterloo)
25 Kathleen Wynne LIB (Don Valley West)

VISIBLE MINORITIES
The Liberals have 11.8% visible minorities.
The NDP have 0% visible minorities.
The PCs have 0% visible minorities.

Here are Ontario’s visible minority MPPs (if I’m missing someone, let me know):

1 Bas Balkissoon LIB (Scarborough—Rouge River)
2 Kuldip Kular LIB (Bramalea—Gore—Malton—Springdale)
3 Shafiq Qaadri LIB (Etobicoke North)
4 Khalil Ramal LIB (London—Fanshawe)
5 Harinder Takhar LIB (Mississauga Centre)
6 Mary Anne Chambers LIB (Scarborough East)
7 Kim Craitor LIB (Niagara Falls)
8 Vic Dhillon LIB (Brampton West-Mississauga)

Note: I thought Kim Craitor was Korean-Canadian for some reason. I guess not. He’s scratched from the list.

NOTE
122.9% is projected. As of 2001 (the last census), 19.1% of Ontario’s population were visible minorities. In 1996, it was 15.8%. Thus, 22.9% represents a straight-line projection from 2001 to 2006.


7 Comments/commentaires
Leave a comment/Enregistrer un commentaire

Kathleen Wynne (also an open Lesbian)

Comment/commentaire by MG 12.14.06 @ 2:54 pm

Thanks MG – not sure why I missed her on the list, since I included her in the calculation. Anyway, I’ve added her name.

Comment/commentaire by democraticspace 12.14.06 @ 3:04 pm

I believe the Liberals have 17 of 74 women in the legislature which is 23% not 25%

Comment/commentaire by shoshana_berman 12.14.06 @ 5:07 pm

Shoshana — the Libs currently have 68 MPPs so 17/68 = 25%.

Comment/commentaire by democraticspace 12.14.06 @ 5:16 pm

“Many of the barriers to women and visible minorities relate to the internal machinations of the parties”
Are you saying that there are groups of white guys sitting around trying to figure out ways to keep women out of politics?
Isn’t it possible that a lot of women don’t find any appeal in the thought of a political career?
As far as the impact of first past the post goes have you considered that a first past the post election is a popularilty contest btween the individual candidates. If a lower percentages of women are elected that would reflect the wishes of the largest section of the given community including all the women that voted.
What could be fairer than that?

Comment/commentaire by Doug 12.15.06 @ 1:46 pm

Doug –
” Are you saying that there are groups of white guys sitting around trying to figure out ways to keep women out of politics?” — No, it’s not a conspiracy, but winning nominations has mostly to do with currying favour with the riding association president and central party bosses. It’s hardly a democratic process in its present form.

“Isn’t it possible that a lot of women don’t find any appeal in the thought of a political career?” Do women inherently not want to be politicians? No. But the aforementioned process of winning nominations probably is less appealing to women than men.

“have you considered that a first past the post election is a popularilty contest between the individual candidates?” this generally isn’t true. it would be more true under a mixed system, because you could vote for your preferred local candidate separately from your preferred party. but under our current system, you only get one vote, and must choose whether to cast it according to the local candidate, the party leader (and thus potential prime minister), or party platform. we know that 60-65% cast their ballot by party, 20-25% by party leader and only 15-20% by local candidate. this doesn’t support your contention that it’s primarily a local popularity contest.

the fact is, a mixed-member system produces the same locally accountable representatives (which would become more locally-driven since your now have a choice between local candidate and party). it also produces regional reps who are accountable to a broader region (and these are elected based on party vote). it’s the best of both worlds.

Comment/commentaire by democraticspace 12.15.06 @ 2:10 pm

Kim Craitor is not a visible minority.

Comment/commentaire by savage 12.26.06 @ 11:35 pm



Leave a comment/Laisser un commentaire
E-mail address never displayed/Votre adresse email ne sera jamais publiee. HTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required/requis)

(required/requis)



If your comment doesn't appear, it is because our automatic anti-spam software is blocking it. If so, just send us an email and we will post it for you.