WANT TO ADVERTISE HERE? INFO | CONTACT US

How the Democrats Will Win the White House
Thursday May 15th 2008, 9:19 am
Filed under: American Politics, - Democrats, - 2008 Presidential Election

The key to the Democrats (likely under Barack Obama) win the White House rests on 3 key strategies, in order of importance:

1) Mobilizing huge turnout in the cities.
2) Winning over suburban independents.
3) Limiting their losses in rural America.

Urban America (more progressive), 30% of U.S. population: For the Democrats to win, they must mobilize urban America, which is traditionally strongly Democratic (even in states that otherwise lean Republican). Cities also have a higher share of African-American, Latino and other minority populations, which have typically supported the Dems. For the Dems to win, they need to register as many people as possible and get them to the polls on election day. The urban get-out-the-vote effort is paramount for the Dems.

Suburban America (more independent), 50% of U.S. population: Just as important, however, is the focus on winning over independents, who make up 38% of the electorate. Urban America leans Democrat and rural America leans Republican, but suburban America is where the highest share of independent voters reside. The suburbs are the true battlegrounds in November. Suburbs are by-and-large middle-class (although some are very wealthy and some are very poor), but span the spectrum from blue- to white-collar. For Dems to win here, they need to focus on meat-and-potato economic issues.

Rural America (more conservative), 20% of U.S. population: While much attention has been paid to the rural (overwhelmingly white) working-class in the Democratic race, the vast majority of this population leans Republican, largely because rural America is more socially conservative and Republicans have positioned themselves as defenders of traditional social values. The key here for Democrats is to limit their losses.

It should be clear that the more you appeal to Urban America (more progressive), the less you will appeal to Rural America (more conservative). The two are inversely proportional. So, strong appeals to conservatives will limit your appeal to progressives, and vice versa. So it is a delicate balance. But given the above core strategies, it is clear that Dems need to target states that have a larger share of urban and suburban population, and, of course, states that were very close in 2004. I will break down these battleground states and what the Dems have to do in them over the coming days.


2 Comments/commentaires
Leave a comment/Enregistrer un commentaire

Good points. I’m concerned with Obama’s support among the white middle/working-classes in America. He seems to do alright among many other categories of voters but he can’t seem to relate to the working class of America. His presumed “eletist” status does not help him either. Can anyone say Obama/Edwards ticket?

Comment/commentaire by The Chairman 05.19.08 @ 4:54 pm

I’d say equate all Republicans as the PNAC party. Republicans have been trying unsuccessfully to date, to wage a new Holy War that would bolster the fortunes of both Neoconservatives and Al-Qaeda (at the expense of the quality-of-living of everyone else on this planet).
America is stuck in a two party system while we have 5. In reality, the Democratic Party is mildly split among Hillary’s poor and union base and Obama’s educated culturally-liberal base. Call me idealistic, but I don’t recognize the gender or race split for the simple reason that were C.Rice to be running as the Republican nominee under a hard Neoconservative platform, no African-American or Woman would be representing their “base” well by electing such a backwards party into power. About the worse that can be said about Obama is the poor aren’t voting for him in primaries. About Hillary’s base, they suck too much capital towards sunset industries.

Contrast that with an element of the Republican Party, the PNAC, in power now, that wants to send society back to the Middle Ages. The USA should split the Republican Party into two elements and likewise for the Democratic Party. Oh well, crappy two party system instead of 4 or 5. So the PNAC Republicans, acting over the last 8 years as if they are prophets, drag down the whole Republican Party forever. Which is sad because someday many centuries from now maybe America will become too Socialist and really need the economic conservatives in office.

Comment/commentaire by Phillip Huggan 05.20.08 @ 10:04 pm



Leave a comment/Laisser un commentaire
E-mail address never displayed/Votre adresse email ne sera jamais publiee. HTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

(required/requis)

(required/requis)



If your comment doesn't appear, it is because our automatic anti-spam software is blocking it. If so, just send us an email and we will post it for you.