What do the 4 federal by-elections tell us?
Tuesday November 10th 2009, 10:09 am
Filed under: - By-Elections, Canadian Politics

What do the 4 by-elections tell us? Generally, not much. The results are a mixed bag. The Conservatives, NDP and BQ can all point to positives (although not universally — while they improved in some places they went down in others), while there was no good news for the Greens and Liberals.

Pundits and media like to see by-elections as tests of party momentum, but this is largely fiction, since the deciding factor in how people vote is so much less about party (as is the case in general elections, when an average 80-85% of votes are party votes) and more about the local candidate, how many resources ($ and people) are put into it, and how effectively each party’s on-the-ground apparatus is mobilized. Moreover, the extremely low turnouts (from a low of 22% in Hochelaga to a “high” of 36% in Montmagny) are not a good indication of what happens when 60 to 70% of people turn out. We’ll have to wait to see how much money (and by association, people) each party put into each race, but I suspect we’ll see a wide range that roughly reflects the results. Below is a comparison of the % vote in the 2008 election (the first number) vs the 2009 by-election.

Montmagny—L’Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup
Conservative — 30.6 vs 42.7 (+12.1)
Bloc — 46.0 vs 37.7 (-8.3)
Liberal — 15.4 vs 13.2 (-2.2)
NDP — 5.4 vs 4.8 (-0.6)
Green — 2.2 vs 1.7 (-0.5)

Hochelaga
Bloc — 49.7 vs 51.2 (+1.5)
Conservative — 9.2 vs 10.1 (+0.9)
Liberal — 20.7 vs 14.3 (-6.4)
NDP — 14.4 vs 19.5 (+5.1)
Green — 4.3 vs 3.3 (-1.0)

Cumberland—Colchester—Musquodoboit Valley
Conservative — 8.8 vs 45.8 (+37.0)
NDP — 12.3 vs 25.7 (+13.4)
Liberal — 8.4 vs 21.3 (+12.9)
Green — n/a vs 3.3 (+3.3)
(note: independent Bill Casey won with 69.0 last time)

New Westminster—Coquitlam
NDP — 41.8 vs 49.6 (+7.8)
Conservative — 38.8 vs 35.8 (-3.0)
Liberal — 11.3 vs 10.3 (-1.0)
Green — 7.2 vs 4.3 (-2.9)

The Conservative did well in Montmagny, while the Bloc under-performed, but the other 3 parties were not far off their 2008 results. The NDP improved in Hochelaga, while the Liberals dropped. The comparison in Cumberland-Colchester is not especially meaningful given Casey’s overwhelming victory in 2008, but it tells us that Conservatives came home to roost while the Liberals and NDP improved by roughly the same amount. The NDP (who generally out-perform their general election results in by-elections) did well in New West, while the Conservatives and Greens under-performed. That the Liberals (who generally don’t do well in by-elections) under-performed their 2008 results in all 3 of the “normal” by-elections (excluding Cumberland) is not welcome news for Ignatieff, but probably the Hochelaga result is the only truly worrying one.


2 Comments/commentaires
Leave a comment/Enregistrer un commentaire

Bloc supporters tend to be young, and I’d guess that lower turnout means disproportionately less young people at the polls. Witness the recent governor election results in Virginia (the majority of the 2009 voters supported McCain in 2008, whereas the state went for Obama). Obama also did very well among young people and they generally didn’t turnout in 2009.

Comment/commentaire by Aaron 11.10.09 @ 5:39 pm

Two of the four ridings, Hochelaga and CCMV, are safe seats where you would need an electoral earthquake to switch. I realize CCMV is a nominal Conservative gain, but without a popular independent like Casey its a safe Conservative seat.

Given the regionalized nature of Canadian politics, its hard to read national trends from by-election results, particularly Quebec results don’t tell you much about what is happening outside Quebec, and vice versa. The Conservative gain in MIKRL tells you nothing about their ability to win GTA ridings from the Liberals.

So the low interest in these by-elections is understandable. Still, the two gains are good news for the government. Four third place finishes are not good news for the Liberals, but then they were not in the mix in any of these ridings. I honestly can’t think of what else can be read from these.

Comment/commentaire by Ed 11.11.09 @ 10:24 am



Leave a comment/Laisser un commentaire
E-mail address never displayed/Votre adresse email ne sera jamais publiee. HTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required/requis)

(required/requis)



If your comment doesn't appear, it is because our automatic anti-spam software is blocking it. If so, just send us an email and we will post it for you.