<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>democraticSPACE.com/blog &#187; &#8211; Senate Reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://democraticSPACE.com/blog/category/canadian-politics/senate-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://democraticSPACE.com/blog</link>
	<description>DemocraticSPACE is one of North America's leading non-partisan political websites.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:44:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What to do with the Canadian Senate?</title>
		<link>http://democraticSPACE.com/blog/2006/12/what-to-do-with-the-canadian-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://democraticSPACE.com/blog/2006/12/what-to-do-with-the-canadian-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Morrow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Senate Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://democraticSPACE.com/blog/2006/12/what-to-do-with-the-canadian-senate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I surely have strong opinions about reforms to the Canadian Senate. But I&#8217;d like to hear what you think before I opine on the subject &#8212; so convince me of your position.
The government has introduced Bill C-43 (An act to provide for consultations with electors on their preferences for appointments to the Senate). What do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I surely have strong opinions about reforms to the Canadian Senate. But I&#8217;d like to hear what you think before I opine on the subject &#8212; so convince me of your position.</p>
<p>The government has introduced <a href="http://www.parl.gc.ca/legisinfo/index.asp?Language=E&#038;Session=14&#038;query=4899&#038;List=toc" target="_blank">Bill C-43 (An act to provide for consultations with electors on their preferences for appointments to the Senate)</a>. What do you think? Should we keep the Senate as is (recognizing that the government has already introduced term limits)? Should Canada institute an elected Senate? (called &#8220;consultations&#8221; so as to avoid opening the Constitution on the issue)? Should the distribution of seats be re-considered (perhaps having equal numbers between different regions i.e. the West, Ontario, Quebec, the East, or some such thing)? Should the Senate be abolished (possibly replaced with a parliamentary research body)? Let me know what you think. Here are some recent opinions that discuss Bill C-43.</p>
<p><font size="2"><strong>LINKS</strong></font><br />
<a href="http://jasoncherniak.blogspot.com/2006/12/harper-please-stop-blustering.html"  target="_blank">Jason Cherniak</a> (Liberal)<br />
<a href="http://www.devonrowcliffe.ca/blog/?p=211" target="_blank">Devon Rowcliffe</a> (Green)<br />
<a href="http://prairiewrangler.blogspot.com/2006/12/legitimate-senate-bite-your-tongue-boy.html"  target="_blank">Prairie Wrangler</a> (Conservative)<br />
<a href="http://accidentaldeliberations.blogspot.com/2006/12/vote-this-down.html" target="_blank>Accidental Deliberations</a> (NDP)<br />
<a href="http://scottdiatribe.gluemeat.com/2006/12/13/reform-the-house-not-the-senate/" target="_blank">Scott Tribe</a> (Liberal)<br />
<a href="http://redtory.blogspot.com/2006/12/sober-second-thoughts.html" target="_blank">Red Tory</a> (Liberal)<br />
<a href="http://www.wernerpatels.com/musings/2006/12/harpers_senate_.html"  target="_blank">Werner Patels</a> (Liberal)<br />
<a href="http://a-view-from-the-left.blogspot.com/2006/12/harper-and-elected-senate-sham.html" target="_blank">A View From the Left</a> (Liberal)<br />
<a href="http://uwhabs.blogspot.com/2006/12/electing-senators.html" target="_blank">UW Habs</a> (Liberal)<br />
<a href="http://bigcitylib.blogspot.com/2006/12/parliamentary-reform-if-we-elect.html" target="_blank">Big City Lib</a> (Liberal)<br />
<a href="http://smokwawelski.blogspot.com/2006/12/how-to-get-elected-senate-without.html" target="_blank">Smok Wawelski&#8217;s Cave</a> (Non-Partisan)<br />
<a href="http://www.fireweeddemocracyproject.ca/blog/?p=28" target="_blank">Robin Sears</a> (Fireweed Democracy Project)<br />
<a href="http://www.fireweeddemocracyproject.ca/blog/?p=31" target="_blank">Rick Anderson</a> (Fireweed Democracy Project)<br />
<a href="http://rootleweb.blogspot.com/2006/12/senate-reform-update.html"  target="_blank">Rootleweb</a> (Conservative)<br />
<a href="http://theblondeconservative.blogspot.com/2006/12/senate-way-it-was-meant-to-be.html" target="_blank">The Blonde Conservative</a> (Conservative)<br />
<a href="http://aaronleewudrick.blogspot.com/2006/12/no-brainer.html" target="_blank">Wudrick Blog</a> (Conservative)<br />
<a href="http://crawlacrosstheocean.blogspot.com/2006/12/double-standards.html" target="_blank">Crawl Across the Ocean</a> (Non-Partisan)<br />
<a href="http://myblahg.com/?p=1636">My Blahg</a> (NDP)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://democraticSPACE.com/blog/2006/12/what-to-do-with-the-canadian-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.135 seconds -->
