LIBERAL LEADERSHIP 2006 HOMEPAGE | DELEGATE RESULTS | BLOG ENTRIES

First Ballot Recap

9:50am
I was hit with a flu bug last night (probably because it’s been so damp and rainy here, which I’m not used to in L.A.), so I apologize for not blogging the results as they came in; I went to bed instead. Still feeling crappy, but I’ll try to keep you up to date.

Well, Ignatieff did poorly on the first ballot. It’s not really surprising, actually. I thought he came off as sightly snobby in his speech — waving to his supporters and displaying his ever-so-slight condescending banter. I was shocked that literally two-thirds of the convention hall did not clap, illustrating his polarizing effect. I thought Gerard Kennedy gave a solid speech — if short on details and long on emotion. His supporters did well to line the middle of the hall, which gave the impression from everywhere that he had huge support. Stephane Dion’s speech was OK, although I found it far too geared towards Harper-bashing. Dryden gave a passionate speech — he obviously deserves a better fate. I think he is a throw-back politician and would have done well in the pre-sound bit era. Volpe’s speech was pretty bad — it was just a tribute to himself. Brison was solid, laying out a specific plan for the environment, which makes his backing of Rae slightly odd; given he lost confidence in Ignatieff, I would have thought he would go to Dion. Martha Hall Findlay was also OK, and her going to Dion is not a surprise.

Just to recap, here are the first ballot results:

IGNATIEFF — 1412 (29.3%)
RAE –977 (20.3%)
DION — 856 (17.8%)
KENNEDY — 854 (17.7%)
DRYDEN — 238 (4.9%)
BRISON — 192 (4.0%)
VOLPE — 156 (3.2%)
HALL-FINDLAY — 130 (2.7%)

I think this makes it difficult if not downright impossible for Ignatieff to win. Brison has gone to Rae, although some of his supporters will probably go to Ignatieff. Volpe has gone to Rae - no surprise there. Hall-Findlay has gone to Dion — no surprise there. That leaves Dryden, who has said he will stick around through the second ballot. I think Kennedy is probably out of the running, because Ignatieff, Rae and Dion will go up in the second ballot. Kennedy probably won’t. Then why would Dryden back Kennedy at that point? He won’t. So, at this point, it look like either Rae or Dion will win.


5 Comments/commentaires
Leave a comment/Enregistrer un commentaire

This captures what I saw very well. I thought the Ignatieff speach quite mechanical with the forced call and response. Rae’s was pure theatre. Just me and my microphone. Charming really. Dryden was worries his last sentence about Canada did not come across but it did loud and clear. A great rallying cry for the liberals!!

Comment/commentaire by John Olson 12.02.06 @ 8:42 am

Greg, as always, great analysis. If we take the latest Ekos poll of Liberal delegates’ second choice and assume that 50% will go with who their first choice supports and the remaining 50% will go with their predetermined second-choice (which can also be who their first choice supported), I get the following numbers for the second ballot:

Iggy: 30%
Rae: 26%
Dion: 21%
Kennedy: 18%
Dryden: 5%

Does anybody know how credible rumours of a Kennedy-Dion pact are? Because if their true, then it looks like Dion’s the man to beat.

Comment/commentaire by Paul 12.02.06 @ 9:11 am

Hey Paul. By now you know those rumours are true and that Dion must surely pass Rae on the 3rd ballot.

It’s also hard to see how Rae could pass Iggy, ergo the final ballot should be Iggy losing to Dion.

CBC has been peddling the rumour that the Iggy forces may be trying to find a way of moving support to rae. This is plausible but logistically very difficult. What could they do? Tell their own supporters to vote for rae on Ballot 3? How could they do that without word quickly getting out?

Comment/commentaire by Abrawang 12.02.06 @ 11:06 am

3rd ballot went much as expected except that Dion was a bit stronger and Rae weaker than I thought.

I reckon that more of Rae’s delegates will go to Dion thus putting him over the top.

Had i been at the convention, I would now be conflicted. I’d have been backing Rae but have been a bit closer on our current two big issues - the environment and the fiscal imbalance, to Dion.

However, I suspect that the Libs have a better chance on beating Harper under Igy than under Dion.

Comment/commentaire by Abrawang 12.02.06 @ 1:16 pm

Had trouble sleeping last night with the rumours of Hall Findlay going to Rae. Going to Dion was the logical thing to do given her increasing reputation in the Liberal party circle. Her role in the renewal of the Liberals will be enormous.

Comment/commentaire by eeid 12.02.06 @ 5:50 pm



Leave a comment/Laisser un commentaire
E-mail address never displayed/Votre adresse email ne sera jamais publiee. HTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

(required/requis)

(required/requis)



If your comment doesn't appear, it is because our automatic anti-spam software is blocking it. If so, just send us an email and we will post it for you.