2006 CANDIDATES
Debbie Stabenow
Michael Bouchard
David Sole
Leonard Schwartz
Dennis FitzSimons


| DATE 1 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
MOE 2 | S 3 |
| NOV 4 | 41.3 | 56.7 | 2.0 | +/- 1.8 | 3044 | |
| OCT 30 | 44.5 | 53.3 | 2.2 | +/- 1.5 | 4050 | |
| OCT 25 | 44.3 | 53.1 | 2.6 | +/- 1.5 | 4093 | |
| OCT 23 | 44.2 | 52.9 | 2.9 | +/- 1.5 | 4265 | |
| OCT 11 | 42.5 | 54.8 | 2.8 | +/- 1.7 | 3515 | |
| OCT 8 | 43.6 | 54.0 | 2.4 | +/- 1.5 | 4072 |
| DATE 1 | POLLSTER | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
MOE 2 | S 3 |
| NOV 4 | SURVEY USA | 43.8 | 54.2 | 2.1 | +/- 3.7 | 687 |
| NOV 2 | DETROIT NEWS | 42.2 | 56.7 | 1.1 | +/- 4.0 | 600 |
| NOV 2 | MASON-DIXON | 39.8 | 57.0 | 3.2 | +/- 3.9 | 625 |
| NOV 2 | DETROIT FREE PRESS | 38.6 | 60.2 | 1.1 | +/- 4.2 | 532 |
| OCT 30 | DETROIT NEWS | 41.8 | 56.0 | 2.2 | +/- 4.0 | 600 |
| OCT 30 | DETROIT NEWS | 41.8 | 57.1 | 1.1 | +/- 4.0 | 600 |
| OCT 25 | DETROIT NEWS | 42.7 | 56.2 | 1.1 | +/- 4.0 | 600 |
| OCT 23 | STRATEGIC VISION | 45.7 | 52.2 | 2.2 | +/- 2.8 | 1200 |
| OCT 22 | RASMUSSEN | 42.4 | 57.3 | 2.1 | +/- 4.4 | 500 |
| OCT 16 | ZOGBY/WSJ | 46.5 | 49.3 | 2.1 | +/- 2.9 | 1150 |
| OCT 11 | DETROIT FREE PRESS | 40.7 | 55.8 | 3.5 | +/- 3.9 | 643 |
| OCT 8 | SURVEY USA | 42.9 | 54.1 | 3.1 | +/- 3.5 | 772 |
| OCT 4 | EPIC/MRA | 41.2 | 56.5 | 2.4 | +/- 4.0 | 600 |
| OCT 3 | RASMUSSEN | 39.8 | 57.1 | 3.1 | +/- 4.4 | 500 |
| SEP 25 | ZOGBY/WSJ | 45.4 | 52.4 | 2.1 | +/- 3.1 | 1000 |
| SEP 17 | STRATEGIC VISION | 45.4 | 52.6 | 2.1 | +/- 2.8 | 1200 |
NOTES
1 Date is the last day that the poll was taken. Often polls are embargoed for several days until their release date.
2 Margin of Error. MOE is related to sample size, 0.98 divided by the square root of the sample size at 95% confidence (19 times out of 20). For example, a sample of 1000 people has a MOE of +/- 3.1% and a sample of 2000 people has a MOE of +/- 2.2%. For rolling averages, the samples are assumed to be independent, thus sample sizes are aggregated to produce an overall MOE. In practice, some polling firms use lists with repeat calls; in these case, it is more precise to reduct these repeat calls from the overall sample size, thus the actual margin of error might be slightly higher. Example: 5 surveys of 1000 people would normally produce a MOE of +/- 1.4%, if samples were independent. If 25% of calls were repeat calls, however, a more accurate MOE would be based on 4000, not 5000, people, producing a MOE of +/- 1.5%.
3 Sample size.
4 Poll numbers exclude undecided voters (and in some cases include estimated for Others), thus are pro-rated to 100%. For example, if the raw poll data shows the Republican candidate with 47%, the Democratic candidate with 41%, Others with 2% and there were 10% undecided, the results excluding undecideds are: Republican 47/90 = 52.2, Democrat 41/90 = 45.6, Others 2/90 = 2.2.

JOIN THE CONVERSATION BELOW
If your comment doesn't appear, it is because our automatic anti-spam software is blocking it. If so, just send us an email and we will post it for you.

Reform
Independence
Peace & Freedom
Marijuana
Socialist
Socialist Workers
Socialist Equality
Personal Choice
Liberty Union Peace
Mountain
MN Independence
Independent



