2006 CANDIDATES
Claire McCaskill
Jim Talent
Frank Gilmour


| DATE 1 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
MOE 2 | S 3 |
| NOV 5 | 48.5 | 49.3 | 2.3 | +/- 1.3 | 3800 | |
| NOV 2 | 48.8 | 49.3 | 1.7 | +/- 1.7 | 3165 | |
| OCT 29 | 49.3 | 48.8 | 1.9 | +/- 1.7 | 3365 | |
| OCT 26 | 49.3 | 48.4 | 2.3 | +/- 1.8 | 3148 | |
| OCT 23 | 49.4 | 48.0 | 2.6 | +/- 1.7 | 3348 | |
| OCT 12 | 47.5 | 49.9 | 2.7 | +/- 1.9 | 2699 |
| DATE 1 | POLLSTER | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
MOE 2 | S 3 |
| NOV 5 | RASMUSSEN | 49.5 | 48.5 | 1.0 | +/- 4.4 | 500 |
| NOV 5 | SURVEY USA | 43.8 | 53.1 | 4.2 | +/- 3.8 | 658 |
| NOV 4 | USA TODAY/GALLUP | 45.9 | 50.0 | 2.0 | +/- 3.2 | 917 |
| NOV 3 | MASON-DIXON | 48.4 | 49.5 | 2.2 | +/- 3.9 | 625 |
| NOV 2 | RASMUSSEN | 48.5 | 49.5 | 2.0 | +/- 4.4 | 500 |
| OCT 31 | REUTERS/ZOGBY | 47.3 | 50.5 | 2.2 | +/- 4.0 | 600 |
| OCT 26 | RASMUSSEN | 48.5 | 49.5 | 2.1 | +/- 4.4 | 500 |
| OCT 29 | CNN | 49.5 | 49.5 | 1.0 | +/- 4.1 | 565 |
| OCT 27 | ZOGBY/WSJ | 49.6 | 48.3 | 2.1 | +/- 3.1 | 1000 |
| OCT 26 | RESEARCH 2000 | 49.0 | 49.0 | 2.0 | +/- 3.5 | 800 |
| OCT 25 | RASMUSSEN | 50.0 | 47.9 | 2.1 | +/- 4.4 | 500 |
| OCT 23 | LA TIMES/BLOOMBERG | 50.0 | 46.9 | 3.1 | +/- 4.0 | 593 |
| OCT 23 | SURVEY USA | 50.5 | 47.4 | 2.1 | +/- 3.9 | 630 |
| OCT 19 | MASON-DIXON | 47.3 | 50.3 | 2.2 | +/- 3.9 | 625 |
| OCT 16 | ZOGBY/WSJ | 50.8 | 48.2 | 1.0 | +/- 3.1 | 1000 |
| OCT 12 | RASMUSSEN | 47.4 | 46.3 | 1.1 | +/- 4.4 | 500 |
| OCT 11 | SURVEY USA | 43.8 | 53.1 | 3.1 | +/- 4.4 | 497 |
| OCT 3 | RASMUSSEN | 48.9 | 50.0 | 1.1 | +/- 4.4 | 500 |
| OCT 1 | USATODAY/GALLUP | 47.4 | 50.5 | 2.1 | +/- 4.1 | 577 |
| SEP 27 | MASON-DIXON | 49.4 | 49.4 | 1.1 | +/- 3.9 | 625 |
NOTES
1 Date is the last day that the poll was taken. Often polls are embargoed for several days until their release date.
2 Margin of Error. MOE is related to sample size, 0.98 divided by the square root of the sample size at 95% confidence (19 times out of 20). For example, a sample of 1000 people has a MOE of +/- 3.1% and a sample of 2000 people has a MOE of +/- 2.2%. For rolling averages, the samples are assumed to be independent, thus sample sizes are aggregated to produce an overall MOE. In practice, some polling firms use lists with repeat calls; in these case, it is more precise to reduct these repeat calls from the overall sample size, thus the actual margin of error might be slightly higher. Example: 5 surveys of 1000 people would normally produce a MOE of +/- 1.4%, if samples were independent. If 25% of calls were repeat calls, however, a more accurate MOE would be based on 4000, not 5000, people, producing a MOE of +/- 1.5%.
3 Sample size.
4 Poll numbers exclude undecided voters (and in some cases include estimated for Others), thus are pro-rated to 100%. For example, if the raw poll data shows the Republican candidate with 47%, the Democratic candidate with 41%, Others with 2% and there were 10% undecided, the results excluding undecideds are: Republican 47/90 = 52.2, Democrat 41/90 = 45.6, Others 2/90 = 2.2.

JOIN THE CONVERSATION BELOW
If your comment doesn't appear, it is because our automatic anti-spam software is blocking it. If so, just send us an email and we will post it for you.

Green
Constitution
Reform
Independence
Peace & Freedom
Marijuana
Socialist
Socialist Workers
Socialist Equality
Personal Choice
Liberty Union Peace
Mountain
MN Independence
Independent



