2006 CANDIDATES
Bob Casey, Jr.
Rick Santorum


| DATE 1 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
MOE 2 | S 3 |
| NOV 2 | 43.2 | 54.6 | 2.2 | +/- 1.8 | 3020 | |
| OCT 28 | 44.4 | 55.6 | - | +/- 1.6 | 3799 | |
| OCT 23 | 45.3 | 54.7 | - | +/- 1.6 | 3596 | |
| OCT 16 | 44.4 | 55.6 | - | +/- 1.8 | 2871 | |
| OCT 15 | 44.2 | 55.8 | - | +/- 1.9 | 2736 | |
| OCT 8 | 44.7 | 55.3 | - | +/- 1.7 | 3436 |
| DATE 1 | POLLSTER | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
MOE 2 | S 3 |
| NOV 2 | MASON-DIXON | 41.9 | 55.9 | 2.2 | +/- 3.9 | 625 |
| NOV 01 | MORNING CALL | 44.3 | 52.6 | 3.1 | +/- 4.4 | 507 |
| OCT 31 | REUTERS | 42.6 | 51.1 | 6.4 | +/- 4.0 | 600 |
| OCT 29 | KEYSTONE | 41.1 | 58.9 | - | +/- 5.2 | 355 |
| OCT 29 | QUINNIPIAC | 44.7 | 55.3 | - | +/- 3.2 | 933 |
| OCT 28 | RASMUSSEN | 43.3 | 56.7 | - | +/- 4.4 | 500 |
| OCT 27 | ZOGBY/WSJ | 45.4 | 54.6 | - | +/- 3.5 | 800 |
| OCT 25 | WEST CHESTER | 43.8 | 56.2 | - | +/- 4.0 | 601 |
| OCT 25 | PHILLY INQUIRER | 41.3 | 58.7 | - | +/- 3.7 | 698 |
| OCT 23 | STRATEGIC VISION | 46.2 | 53.8 | - | +/- 2.8 | 1200 |
| OCT 21 | MASON-DIXON | 43.3 | 56.7 | - | +/- 3.9 | 625 |
| OCT 8 | ZOGBY/WSJ | 45.8 | 54.2 | - | +/- 3.6 | 760 |
| OCT 8 | RASMUSSEN | 43.3 | 56.2 | - | +/- 4.4 | 500 |
| OCT 8 | MUHLENBERG | 47.1 | 52.9 | - | +/- 4.3 | 511 |
| OCT 5 | RASMUSSEN | 42.5 | 57.5 | - | +/- 4.4 | 500 |
| OCT 5 | REUTERS/ZOGBY | 42.9 | 57.1 | - | +/- 4.0 | 600 |
| SEP 26 | MASON-DIXON | 44.9 | 55.1 | - | +/- 3.9 | 625 |
| SEP 24 | STRATEGIC VISION | 45.3 | 54.7 | - | +/- 2.8 | 1200 |
NOTES
1 Date is the last day that the poll was taken. Often polls are embargoed for several days until their release date.
2 Margin of Error. MOE is related to sample size, 0.98 divided by the square root of the sample size at 95% confidence (19 times out of 20). For example, a sample of 1000 people has a MOE of +/- 3.1% and a sample of 2000 people has a MOE of +/- 2.2%. For rolling averages, the samples are assumed to be independent, thus sample sizes are aggregated to produce an overall MOE. In practice, some polling firms use lists with repeat calls; in these case, it is more precise to reduct these repeat calls from the overall sample size, thus the actual margin of error might be slightly higher. Example: 5 surveys of 1000 people would normally produce a MOE of +/- 1.4%, if samples were independent. If 25% of calls were repeat calls, however, a more accurate MOE would be based on 4000, not 5000, people, producing a MOE of +/- 1.5%.
3 Sample size.
4 Poll numbers exclude undecided voters (and in some cases include estimated for Others), thus are pro-rated to 100%. For example, if the raw poll data shows the Republican candidate with 47%, the Democratic candidate with 41%, Others with 2% and there were 10% undecided, the results excluding undecideds are: Republican 47/90 = 52.2, Democrat 41/90 = 45.6, Others 2/90 = 2.2.

JOIN THE CONVERSATION BELOW
If your comment doesn't appear, it is because our automatic anti-spam software is blocking it. If so, just send us an email and we will post it for you.

Green
Libertarian
Constitution
Reform
Independence
Peace & Freedom
Marijuana
Socialist
Socialist Workers
Socialist Equality
Personal Choice
Liberty Union Peace
Mountain
MN Independence
Independent



