2006 CANDIDATES
Harold Ford, Jr.
Bob Corker
Chris Lugo
Ed Choate
David “None of the Above” Gatchell
Emory “Bo” Heyward
H. Gary Keplinger


| DATE 1 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
MOE 2 | S 3 |
| NOV 5 | 52.6 | 45.9 | 1.5 | +/- 1.4 | 4822 | |
| OCT 30 | 49.6 | 48.4 | 2.0 | +/- 1.7 | 3236 | |
| OCT 25 | 47.2 | 50.5 | 2.3 | +/- 1.7 | 3320 | |
| OCT 11 | 47.8 | 50.2 | 2.1 | +/- 1.8 | 3030 |
| DATE 1 | POLLSTER | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
MOE 2 | S 3 |
| NOV 5 | SURVEY USA | 52.6 | 47.4 | 0.0 | +/- 3.8 | 679 |
| NOV 4 | RASMUSSEN | 52.6 | 48.0 | 0.0 | +/- 4.4 | 500 |
| NOV 3 | USA TODAY/GALLUP | 50.5 | 47.4 | 2.1 | +/- 3.3 | 877 |
| NOV 3 | MASON-DIXON | 54.9 | 41.8 | 3.3 | +/- 3.9 | 625 |
| NOV 2 | RASMUSSEN | 53.0 | 45.0 | 2.0 | +/- 4.4 | 500 |
| OCT 31 | REUTERS | 54.1 | 43.9 | 2.0 | +/- 4.0 | 600 |
| OCT 30 | RASMUSSEN | 50.0 | 48.0 | 2.0 | +/- 4.4 | 500 |
| OCT 29 | CNN | 53.6 | 45.4 | 1.0 | +/- 4.2 | 541 |
| OCT 27 | ZOGBY/WSJ | 49.5 | 48.5 | 2.0 | +/- 3.3 | 900 |
| OCT 25 | SURVEY USA | 49.0 | 49.0 | 2.0 | +/- 3.5 | 780 |
| OCT 23 | LA TIMES/BLOOMBERG | 45.8 | 51.0 | 3.1 | +/- 4.3 | 515 |
| OCT 20 | MASON-DIXON | 50.0 | 47.8 | 2.2 | +/- 3.9 | 625 |
| OCT 19 | RASMUSSEN | 46.3 | 51.6 | 2.1 | +/- 4.4 | 500 |
| OCT 16 | ZOGBY/WSJ | 45.0 | 52.9 | 2.1 | +/- 3.3 | 900 |
| OCT 11 | RASMUSSEN | 47.9 | 50.0 | 2.1 | +/- 4.4 | 500 |
| OCT 9 | SURVEY USA | 50.0 | 47.9 | 2.1 | +/- 4.2 | 539 |
| OCT 2 | REUTERS/ZOGBY | 48.2 | 48.2 | 3.6 | +/- 4.0 | 600 |
| OCT 1 | USATODAY/GALLUP | 46.9 | 52.1 | 1.0 | +/- 3.3 | 891 |
| OCT 1 | RASMUSSEN | 46.2 | 51.6 | 2.2 | +/- 4.4 | 500 |
NOTES
1 Date is the last day that the poll was taken. Often polls are embargoed for several days until their release date.
2 Margin of Error. MOE is related to sample size, 0.98 divided by the square root of the sample size at 95% confidence (19 times out of 20). For example, a sample of 1000 people has a MOE of +/- 3.1% and a sample of 2000 people has a MOE of +/- 2.2%. For rolling averages, the samples are assumed to be independent, thus sample sizes are aggregated to produce an overall MOE. In practice, some polling firms use lists with repeat calls; in these case, it is more precise to reduct these repeat calls from the overall sample size, thus the actual margin of error might be slightly higher. Example: 5 surveys of 1000 people would normally produce a MOE of +/- 1.4%, if samples were independent. If 25% of calls were repeat calls, however, a more accurate MOE would be based on 4000, not 5000, people, producing a MOE of +/- 1.5%.
3 Sample size.
4 Poll numbers exclude undecided voters (and in some cases include estimated for Others), thus are pro-rated to 100%. For example, if the raw poll data shows the Republican candidate with 47%, the Democratic candidate with 41%, Others with 2% and there were 10% undecided, the results excluding undecideds are: Republican 47/90 = 52.2, Democrat 41/90 = 45.6, Others 2/90 = 2.2.

JOIN THE CONVERSATION BELOW
If your comment doesn't appear, it is because our automatic anti-spam software is blocking it. If so, just send us an email and we will post it for you.

Libertarian
Constitution
Reform
Independence
Peace & Freedom
Marijuana
Socialist
Socialist Workers
Socialist Equality
Personal Choice
Liberty Union Peace
Mountain
MN Independence



